Reflections

How to test the Quality of your Vision

John Tieso

Author, Lecturer in Management & Healthcare Systems

Arlington VA, January 3 2017

[Reprinted from LinkIn]

 

We all have personal visions, and may have professional or commercial visions as well. But how do you know if your vision is what it should be? Perhaps, there is a way to tell the quality level of your desires.

Personally, I like to think of several things:

First - does the proposed vision truly represent me (or my organization)? That should not be a difficult question to answer, if you have standards and ethical considerations that you apply in your life and/or work.

Second, would my desired approach -- my vision, cause others to follow me, leaving their own level of comfort, to take on a new challenge? From a personal perspective, am I giving people the kind of information they can believe in, and feel success from?

Third, and connection to the previous questions, does the approach -- the vision-- I suggest give people a reason to believe it can succeed, and that they want to be part of that success? Are others willing to depart from their own personal 'comfort zone' to try? Are YOU really willing to do the same thing?

 

Fourth, does this vision 'breathe' success? In order to do that, you have to clearly understand what your vision proposes, and have others both understand and agree without perspective. if you cannot adequately articulate what you propose, others will normally not follow.

Fifth, and finally, are you willing to go the distance to achieve your vision? Are you ready to accept that it might require change as time moves on, and are you ready to make those changes needed to ensure success?

If you can truly say YES to all of these questions, and understand how to express that assurance to others, you are on the way to making change or opportunity, or both, happen. Good luck in your efforts.

Never Jump to Conclusions

 

 

Arlington VA 22202 December 20 2017

[Reprinted from LinkedIn August 12 2016]

 

 

A few evenings ago, i happened to be at home with no papers to grade or projects to review, and put on Public Broadcasting. It just so happened that one on my favorite Agatha Christie novels was being televised, Body in the Library, and I knew that would be the main event of the evening.

As I watched movie, a British version by their equivalent of PBS,  it came to me that the genius of Dame Christie was not limited just to murder and mayhem; he also provided some subliminal messages to the audience that many of us in the business world could easily adopt ourselves. let me suggest just a few for discussion here.

First, never jump to conclusions before you have a reasonable set of facts. Miss Marple, the amateur criminologist, will get you every time. In this case, while it was clearly murder from the outset, and Dame Christie provides a complex set of circumstances that keeps you bouncing between characters, nearly until the ending, when suddenly all becomes clear.

Unfortunately, in much of society, people pick up strands of data, not even information really, and quickly 'decide' the result. Usually, they are wrong, but they have done so much damage to themselves and their reputation, and to others that regardless of the outcome, people are scarred unnecessarily.  First impressions can be a hypothesis to be proven (or dis-proven) but they should not be the sole factor in decision-making.

Second, make sure you truly have facts and not simply plausible conjecture.Inspector Slack, the intrepid detective in the novel, has the reputation for looking twice at everything, and then searching again to prove or disprove what is before him. That riles his superiors, and confounds his associates sometimes, but it leads to good decisions. In our world of communications and technology, what seems to be happening might be something completely different. How many never check resumes of prospects, or 'think' someone is the 'expert' in an area, and move forward, only to find they were completely wrong in their approach? Assembling data still makes it data--it is the context that transforms it into information, which must them be checked for authenticity, applicability, and reality.  All too often, each of us has skipped those steps and paid the price.

Third, when you are too close to something, recognize it and step back. One of the things I like about this novel is that it is set in the countryside in England, where people who live on the nearby properties are your friends, neighbors, and often professional associates. The Chief Inspector lived next to the prime suspect ( they are both retired colonels) and both active in the administration of the district. The Chief Inspector logically would like to prove that his friend is not involved in the murder. he accepts his word for it, and then actively steers the investigation away from him, in any way he can, including taking every step of the investigation with his subordinates.

Logic should say that you trust your associates and subordinates to good the job expected on them. If you do not have trust, you do not have a team--you do have a group which happens to be in the same place at the same time, but working to different objectives. Leadership often gives way to mentorship in situations where you either have a personal interest or some other conflict that ought to ring bells to say--STAY AWAY FROM HERE.  That does not mean to put up a wall so high you cannot provide oversight; it does mean that you trust the judgement of others that they will bring the truth to you.

Finally, teams get answers, not groups working discordantly. Working through issues with each member of the team providing their expertise provides much better answers than a kluged together supposition based on little or no facts. Put the people in charge who know how to get those answers; let them lead the group as you become their mentor. A good leader does not always have to be 'in charge'. A good leader does have to engender respect, provide mentorship, and be ready to assist where needed to achieve the desired result. Most efforts, however are team efforts, not solo efforts.

One additional comment here. Look for the Miss Marple's of the world; those with an immense knowledge base that can provide observations and answers where none seem to be present. These people are not usually out in front leading, they are more generally in the background and hard to find. if you do find one, you have a jewel that will light the way to success.

Bottom line here: Sometimes a good detective story shows you the way to solve difficult problems, even if they do not involve murder or mayhem.

Source:      Agatha Christie, MIss Marple: The Body in the Library (Adapted as a TV Mini-Series, 1984)  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088833/

Developing Your Vision

Arlington VA July 30, 2016

In a recent article titled "Be an Outstanding leader", I discussed how vision is so imp0rtant to success. In fact, without a clear and understandable vision, it is nearly impossible to craft success because you do not know where you want to be at some future time.

Think of a vision as a story about yourself; your goals, aspirations, and desires to satisfy customers.  As Stan Toler says, in his excellent book "Outstanding Leadership" (Harvest House Press, 2016), "The core principle of a developing vision plan is its impact on people's needs. Organizations built solely on steel and plastic, and a rigid corporate infrastructure will slowly drift into the sunset unless they have a mindset of 'customer first', and 'opinion matters'."

The basis of a vision then is your image of how you intend to satisfy customers and clients. Your 'story' is about you, your organization, what they do, how they do it, and how well they satisfy their customers or clients. A good story speaks to the convictions and motivations which led to the creation of the organization, how the leaders perceive that their skills and capabilities are what the customer wants and needs, and why they should come to you for those capabilities rather than someone else.

Leadership is the crux of the effort. The authentic, effective leader  knows the organization well; perhaps better than others. He understands what it took to get to the current state, how well that state can be supported and improved, what qualities the organization possesses which are desired by customers, and can develop l;ans to get and keep customers, with their acceptance and buy-in.

A successful business operation is not about the business itself. It is not about the infrastructure, the technology, or even the the employees per se. it is about how all of these constituent parts of the organization contribution to satisfying the needs of the customers, and even those who share the convictions of the customers.

Let me give you a short example here. Too many years ago, as i was growing up in Boston, most families bought from the local department stores, especially Woolworth's and Sears Roebuck because of their reputation for helpful service, and clothing and other items which lasted a long time. Clothing especially lasted a very long time, and was often passed between children as they grew and even to other families in the neighborhood. The department stores befitted from not just the original sale, but from the goodwill generated by the continued use of their products, and then the shoppers who came to buy similar goods, based on their second-hand experiences.  All of the department stores of the day concentrated on assuring customers of their quality, wearability, usability, and availability at a reasonable price for those goods.

The companies all developed their vision around customer service, quality, price, and availability. Using those elements of their vision, they developed their strategies and plans knowing that they could answer the four questions most recently posed by Toler:

Who are we?

What do we Do?

Where are we going?

How and when will we get there?

 

In the next parts of this series, we will look in more depth at some potential ways to answer these questions, aimed at success.

 

 

 

Be an Outstanding Leader

Arlington, VA July 14, 2016

As I often say to my students, leadership is a learned art--on which takes time and patience to comprehend and even more time to understanding enough of the principles and practices to succeed. Recently, on a stroll through the local market, I came across a small book, titled "Outstanding Leadership", by Stan Toler, published by Harvest House Press. it is a small book, only 4x6, but packed into the 150 pages or so, are some real gems on true, authentic leadership.

I want to share a few of these tidbits over several  short articles in the next few weeks, but I also found the perfect place to start. In one of his introductory chapters, Toler discusses the first voyage of Christopher Columbus to the new world:

"Before Columbus departed, he didn't have a clue where he was going."

"When he arrived, he didn't have a clue where he was."

"When he got ready to leave, he didn't have a clue how to get back home."

 

Toler goes to discuss visioning and creating strategy--activities which prevent just what Columbus went through on his voyage. Since it isn't logically possible to tie a rope to the pier in Spain, and let it out as you go forward, or try to drop crumbs into the ocean that you can find later, you have to have some form of alternative strategy that will do what you want to do. Unlike Columbus, people do not generally simply get into a boat and sail away, hoping for the best, and perhaps a few orientals indicating you have reached the Orient. At least, that was his plan for the time.

Columbus had a vision; he wanted to reach the Orient by sailing West rather than East as had already been done by others. He also has a shaky strategy; take three ships and men and sail out hoping that the world was not flat, and his ships would not fall over the end of the world. He traveled on faith rather than fact, and ended up being right, there was a way to travel west and reach something--it just was not the Orient. Instead, he ran into an obstacle of sorts--another continent--which stood in his way of achieving his goal, his vision.

The essential fact is that you have to have a vision to be successful, especially as a leader. The vision has to be real; otherwise it is nothing more than a dream. It has attributes, such as:

    - It is people-driven, or as Toler says, 'defined with people in mind'; not just any group of people, but those with a part in the process.

    - It is real as opposed to something that might look real, but in actually a fantasy. Toler describes the difference between a real Christmas Tree and a fake one bought in a store. it may look real, but the texture, the smell, and the way it ages (or does not) gives away its reality.

    - It must be practical; reflecting reasonable, people-focused goals and objectives. Where people do not relate to the vision, it quickly becomes irrelevant. Moreover, as Toler indicates, 'a definitive and easy to relate vision gains relevance and buy-in as it is developed and and distributed.'

    -It is inspirational, causing people to want to act and respond to it.

Finally, there is one more aspect to visioning, and perhaps its most important attribute: it is, as Toler relates, 'Born in the mind and Heart'. it starts with an idea, and blossoms into a full-blown solution which can be formed, organized, related, and provides the motivation for people to want to succeed because they believe in it as much as its creator.

While visioning is certainly about achieving success, it is also about how success is achieved and provides the first kindling for the development of changes to the culture of the organization. In many ways, it describes the life blood of the organization, how it work with and succeed with employees, manager,s owners, and customers alike in their shared view of success.

In the next part of this series we will speak to strategy as a means of taking vision and expressing the HOW a visioneer sees their idea gain relevance and structure in the organization.

Eight Rules for Company Sabotage

Arlington VA May 10, 2016

Some form of sabotage exists in most companies; much of it relatively benign, but some amount causes real damage, economically and administratively for management. I began thinking about that topic some weeks ago, during a discussion over lunch with several professional friends, one of whom was involved in trying to develop a company policy designed to reduce or prevent sabotage, at their request.

My concern was that it seemed to me to be virtually impossible to prevent all but the most egregious forms of sabotage, especially that which is inadvertent, coming from someone with no real axe to grind or animosity for anyone. There are always people who sometimes disagree with decisions, but ‘agree to disagree’ and simply move on. There are others who let those decisions with which they disagree become subconscious irritants, which can reduce productivity, and create untoward results.

Among the small group, we were pretty much agreed that there were no hard-and-fast rules, that a great deal depended on hos decisions are made in the organization, and how inclusive management is in getting input and feedback on changes to policy and procedure. We left it at that, and our associate went back to his work after lunch probably thinking he still did not have a good approach for his task.

Then I read an article in the recent issue of Workforce Magazine, found the digital copy of the article and sent it to my friend. In the article by Bob Frisch, Rob Gifford, and Cary Greene, titled, “Sabotage in the Workplace is an Inside Job,”, these amazingly thoughtful writers described how they discovered an old World War II-era publication from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS – Now the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)) with a set of eight (8) tactics for encouraging (believe it or not) sabotage in the workplace. Most of these tactics are what we still see today. They are:

• Insist on doing everything ‘though channels’ – Always follow the chain of command to the letter, and you will always be ‘correct’.
• Make Speeches – Be an active debater, orator, and stump speaker every chance you get, and use a lot of time to prevent decisions
• Refer matters to committees or working groups whenever possible to delay decisions even further
• Bring up irrelevant issues whenever possible
• Haggle over precise wording on communications, minutes, and resolutions
• Refer back to matters discussed and decided previously to attempt to reopen those discussions
• Always advocate caution and reasonableness as well as avoiding haste in decision-making
• Engender a sense of ‘worry’ about any decision. As the authors say, ‘Raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated is within the jurisdiction of the group,’ or whether it might conflict with some higher policy or decision.

In short, make it as hard as possible to make decisions and execute them. Active saboteurs will use these tactics every chance they get, but they still seem to be publicly supporting the effort, just ‘cautious.’

The inadvertent or innocent saboteur may not realize that their ‘conservative’ approach is actually gumming up the works for others. They may have honest principles which they use to base their questions and opposition. It can be difficult to separate the innocent saboteur from those who are knowingly trying to prevent action. The article discusses several approaches to reducing occurrences. It is a great read, and my associate, after receiving it felt a lot more secure in recommending policies and practices to his client. You just might find the same.

You can read the entire article here.  Comments appreciated.

CASE STUDY: Volkwagon & The Culture of Greed

April 28, 2016 Arlington VA

This is one of the first Case Studies we will use in the Fall Semester. Volkswagon is considered one of the premier companies in the world, yet it still succumbed to a major ethical crisis on its odometer reading scandal.  Read it here: https://genehughson.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/volkswagen-and-the-cost-of-culture/

 

What did the Founding Fathers know about Leadership that we have Forgotten?

 

April 21, 2016 Arlington, VA

The founding fathers were collectively a group of very smart men. They understood that their life depended on their decisions, and they were not afraid to make decisions based on their best knowledge and experience. What they often had, though was a good sense of ethics and virtue and the willingness to consistently display those attributes during even the most trying times.

I found a recent article by Ava Ralph of the Professional Biz Blog, which points out five of the fundamental leadership  questions and concerns which face all of us who choose to take management position, and what they did to solve their problems using these principles.  It is well worth read. You can find the original article here.

Developing and Maintaining Ethical Practices in the Workplace

Arlington VA February 18, 2016

Developing, and then maintaining ethical practices in the workplace is not just a matter of announcing expected behaviors and trying to enforce them. People generally do not react well to arm-twisting or threats--instead they leave. if they are valued employees, it is the company or agency that loses, not the employee; who will often quickly find employment elsewhere.

So, how do we avoid brain drain and lose productivity from an ethical perspective?

In my mind, there are three perspectives to the answer to this question.

First, You have to have a program in place which defines the vision, ethically and culturally, that the employees know exists, and also know how they are expected to comply. That in itself can be a difficult task. It is more than simply putting up signs with trite slogans or lists of 'You musts...'. it must be clear, in language they understand, communicated to then, along with the importance of compliance, and reinforced periodically to ensure that behavior continues to meet expectations. You do not need a club to enforce expected behavior. What you need is the cooperation of employees, demonstrations that management follows the same rules, and assurance that the rules are enforced equally and fairly.

Second, expected outcomes in terms of behavior must be as important as productivity. Too many firms place more attention on productivity--its impact on the bottom line, and its influence over executives and shareholders. The result all too often is slippage in quality of work--products or services--all designed to overlook 'minor' flaws so that numbers meet expectations. When reduced quality is know by management, but not corrected, employees see that behaviors and expectations are not longer as critical and their work quality level is not important.

Similarly, when employees are criticized for work habits, but supervisors and managers  seem to be living under differing rules, employees will eventually expect that they also can live under different rules. When this happens, further slippages will occur, and eventually major problems surface which management had not expected.

Third, behavior needs to be monitored, expectations reinforced, and unacceptable behavior needs to be corrected. There are two sides to this situation. Management should not be seen simply as a punisher; rather, enforcement of values and behaviors should be evenly enforced. Positive reinforcement should accompany good work. it costs nothing but time to tell an employee or a group that their work is well-done. Simple awards, group reinforcement, and sometimes nothing more than a thank you will provide the stimulus for people to work harder, and at a higher quality level.

Conversely, When something does go wrong; when work is shoddy and not up to expected standards, corrective action needs to be taken, privately if possible, but taken in a way that employees understand that bad work is not acceptable. This applies to both lower level personnel and supervisors or managers. Consequences should be clearly outlined and explained to employees with periodic meetings, communications, or counseling sessions. Critical behaviors should be included in evaluation processes and during considerations for pay adjustments.

Creating and then maintaining programs designed to instill ethical, value-based behaviors in the workplace are not done in a vacuum, or informally. The organization must have an organized plan--one which everyone at all levels knows and understands, which is enforced fairly and evenly, and which carries with in the strong support of management at all levels.

Related articles

When the boss's ethical behavior breaks bad

Why your ethical boss is sometimes a jerk

Why Your Boss Shouts And Screams

Ethics, Conflicts of Interest and Management

Ethics and Florida Psychology Law

The only way is ethics

Is Business Ethics an Oxymoron?

Arlington VA November 30, 2015

    The concept of 'business ethics' is one of those terms which causes quite different reactions in different people--and not always for the same reasons. A recent article in Fast Company, the magazine of business management entrepreneurs, by David Meyer of the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan seems to think so, and for good reason, as he aptly points out.

    "Even before the financial crisis of the past decade, there were the Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco scandals. Before those, there was Gordon Gecko. And while the U.S. economy is finally recovering, the wealth disparity between rich and poor continues to yawn wider. Memories of Wall Street execs cutting themselves big bonuses right after being bailed out are still potent, and so is the popular impression that business and ethics just don't go together," says Meyer, in his introduction.

    The sad thing is that he is RIGHT. People simply do not believe that business and ethics can truly go together, but they can, if proper safeguards, including the opportunity to act ethically, is enshrined in an organization. Unfortunately, that is often not the case in this rush to fame and fortune world we live in.

    It's a great article, and very timely. If you don't have time to read the whole article, read the story at the start and see if that picture fits you as well.

 

 

What is more important, PROFIT or REPUTATION

Arlington VA November 24, 2015

 

You can have both, if you choose to do so!

    This is question that haunts every owner sooner or later., especially when faced with cutting costs in a downturn. Running a business is not easy--it is as simple as that. Making the wrong decision on how to proceed can be a disaster. But, there are things you can do to avoid that disaster--if you take the time to think them out carefully, and not, as the proverbial saying goes:  "Put your mouth in motion before you put your mind in gear".

    Lets look at both. Profit, the bottom line, is what determines if you will succeed and stay in business or go under.  While you can continue to exist for a short time 'in the red', there is a point along your monthly financials that it becomes obvious, if you do not do something different, you will fail. That may mean reducing costs, either through finding cheaper suppliers, reducing employees, reducing benefits, or finding some investor willing to stick with you for a period of time, or even for the long term. All of these can reduce your costs against income.

    Reducing costs against income may not achieve what you expect it to achieve--especially where your cost reductions affect the income. Let me give you several examples.

    Would you, as an owner or a restaurant or small store, with several employees who are well-liked, competent, and bring in the customer base, reduce their hours, or replace them with less-costly employees?

    Would you tell your supplier that you want to replace high-selling stock items with lesser cost items (Which may be already on your shelves but not selling well) and still expect that people will shop in your store?

    Would you consider a 'bait-and-switch' situation where you promise something, and then claim the item(s) are not in stock, but you have higher-priced items available? 

    Would you tell employees to cut the quality level of your products?  Take a deli that offers a broad selection of sliced meats. Would you tell your employees to slice thinner, getting more from the bulk item? Would you tell your employees to cut the amount of ingredients, on the hope that your customers simply do not notice?

    The answers to the questions above will tell you how important you believe achieving your desired bottom line profit means to your overall outlook.

    Then there is your reputation to consider. Look at the questions again, and this time consider if your customers find out that you are doing what is described, and they do not like what they see. if and when they do (And customers ALWAYS eventually find out what you have done), what will the knowledge do to your reputation? What will any damage to your reputation do to your income, and your bottom line?

    Warren Buffett has said many times that creating a reputation takes years, but damage to it can ruin your reputation literally in minutes.  It will take years to improve it, and former customers will eventually let everyone they know about what they have found. There is often a ripple effect here.

    So, we return to the original question--What is more important, Profit or Reputation?  I will argue the answer is BOTH. Planning and thought can design solutions that preserve your reputation, while improving your bottom line. i often tell my restaurant clients that reducing menu items, and, concurrently reducing inventory--while retaining the quality of base ingredients--produces results that please customers while reducing the variable costs. Instead of reducing employee hours, give them inducements to bring their customers in more often.

    I buy a lot at Staples, as does anyone who needs office supplies. it might not be Staples itself, it might be another firm, but the occasional discount to bring in more business; the specials well down in price on brand name items, and the other little benefits of being a valued customer make it worth coming in a little more often, and thinking about them as soon as you realize you need something. At its heart, simple marketing "The personal touch" may be all it takes to improve income, reduce the costs squeeze, and maintain a good reputation.

    Variable costs have variable solutions--it takes a bit of thinking, but it is worth the effort.